Move map_project to closures#2185
Merged
Manishearth merged 6 commits intounicode-org:mainfrom Jul 15, 2022
Merged
Conversation
Manishearth
requested review from
gregtatum,
nordzilla,
sffc and
zbraniecki
as code owners
Member
|
CI is stuck |
sffc
approved these changes
Jul 15, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #1061
This moves the Yoke
map_projectfunctions all over to using closures, and also ensures that the closurefull functions have full functionality.This does not remove the
_with_capturefunctions from Yoke, however it renames them to_with_explicit_capture. As a util crate Yoke can always remove them in the future, but holding on to them gives us a wider range of Rust version support in Yoke.ICU4X DataPayload does not do this: it only has the closure APIs. If something breaks in the compiler in the future it should not be hard for us to re-add
_with_explicit_captureAPIs as needed, but it's cleaner to not start with them. I'm also adding tests upstream (rust-lang/rust#99257).